13 Comments
User's avatar
Stephanie Vee's avatar

Since generative AI was used to create the image that accompanies this post, I feel it’s prudent to mention that Jordan Acosta has a great list of free, ethically-sourced (i.e. non-AI) image resources Substack writers can use: https://www.jordanacosta.co/p/free-to-use-picture-resources

Expand full comment
Nigel Bowen's avatar

Thanks for the heads-up, Stephanie. Everyone please check out Jordan Acosta!

Expand full comment
aaron crozier's avatar

I’m not so sure. I’m a lecturer and exam author in accountancy and the current AI’s can’t add up anything correctly, make up references, can’t do double entry bookkeeping and are generally worse than the students. They will need to improve a great deal from here. From what I can see, actual experts in anything will tell you the same - it looks great if you only have a reasonable knowledge of whatever subject you’ve asked about, but for any more than that, it will need a lot of control. I use AI a lot, but basically as a very advanced search engine that gives me the information quickly that I can then go through to sift out the rubbish and correct all the errors.

Expand full comment
Nigel Bowen's avatar

Thanks for the thoughtful feedback, Aaron. All your points are valid - there are still plenty of bugs to work out before Skynet achieves self-awareness!

Expand full comment
And Yet's avatar

I’ll sell my ability to tell the truth 100% of the time. Every Ai I’ve tried seems incapable of doing that.

Expand full comment
Saxifrage's avatar

A factor I read about elsewhere is that it's all very well getting generative AI to do the leg work (draft the contract) and then get an experienced human lawyer to review and assure it; but that experienced human lawyer only got that experience by at some point being a junior lawyer who drafted contracts. Using AI for the lower grades cuts off the supply chain of experienced humans in the long run. So if we use generative AI for this stuff we will get to the point where there is no human competent to review and assure it. The counterargument I guess is that eventually the AI will be better than humans at all grades so why would you want a human anyway? - but in that case we will have arrived at a point of zero human agency and WE WILL NEVER KNOW if the AI is right because noone is experienced enough to judge it.

Expand full comment
Nigel Bowen's avatar

Thanks for the thoughtful feedback, Saxfrage! Yes, you make a valid point - it appears those entry-level, educational roles you speak of are already starting to evaporate and, as you point out, if that continues, we humans will just have to take our new AI overlords at their word in the coming decades.

Expand full comment
Clayton Ramsey's avatar

PDF files full of prompts optimized for writing anti-AI blog posts. And highly fetishized pictures of my hands. My feet aren’t too easy on the eyes.

Expand full comment
Ken Kovar's avatar

AI seems to be ushering in for developers at least what Nassim Taleb calls “extremistan” in his book the Black Swan. It’s a very worthwhile read!

Expand full comment
Nigel Bowen's avatar

Yep, I'm a big fan of Taleb, despite his tiresomely substantial ego. Definitely think we're headed into Extremistan in the near future.

Expand full comment
Trudi Jenkins's avatar

Enjoyed this Nigel, hope you are well

Expand full comment
Trudi Jenkins's avatar

Well maybe enjoyed is the wrong term but it was a great read

Expand full comment
Nigel Bowen's avatar

Thanks, Trudi! I seem to remember you sending me an encouraging note three years ago encouraging me to persevere with this humble blog and I'm glad I took your advice. I'm OK, all things considered, hope you're doing well too.

Expand full comment